1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2006 Citroen C2
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,398 cc, 2006 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C2 (67 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Allegro | 2006 Citroen C2 | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | Allegro | C2 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1398 cc |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2320 mm |
