1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Kangoo (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Allegro | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Allegro | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |