1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Allegro | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Allegro | 3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2639 mm |