1983 Austin Allegro vs. 2012 Nissan Cube

To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1983 Austin Allegro. (43 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 468 kg more than 1983 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Cube (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Allegro 2012 Nissan Cube
Make Austin Nissan
Model Allegro Cube
Year Released 1983 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 43 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1268 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1694 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1651 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2530 mm