1983 Austin Ambassador vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Austin Ambassador is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Ambassador (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Ambassador should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Austin Ambassador weights approximately 435 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Austin Ambassador (131 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Austin Ambassador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Ambassador | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | Ambassador | 102 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |
