1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1948 Holden FX

To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (86 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1948 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1948 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Austin Maestro weights approximately 14 kg more than 1948 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1948 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1948 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro. 1983 Austin Maestro has automatic transmission and 1948 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1948 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Austin Maestro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: