1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1948 Simca 11
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 11 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (67 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1948 Simca 11. (60 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Austin Maestro weights approximately 465 kg more than 1948 Simca 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Simca 11 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Simca 11. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 1948 Simca 11 | |
| Make | Austin | Simca |
| Model | Maestro | 11 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1089 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2250 mm |
