1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (67 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 235 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Maestro | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1983 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2040 mm |