1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Simca 8 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | Maestro | 8 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2430 mm |