1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 755 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Maestro | Caprice |
Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 6476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |