1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1968 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Austin Maestro weights approximately 355 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1968 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Maestro | 2CV |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 65 L |