1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (67 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Maestro | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2060 mm |
