1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1983 Austin Maestro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (109 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Austin Maestro (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Austin Maestro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | Maestro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
