1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1986 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 260 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Austin | Plymouth |
| Model | Maestro | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2470 mm |
