1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Maestro | FTO |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.6 mm | 69 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
