1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (109 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 980 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | Maestro | Armada |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4310 mm |
