1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (109 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Austin Maestro (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Austin Maestro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Maestro | 626 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2620 mm |