1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (109 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 780 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | Maestro | Villager |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2860 mm |