1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2000 Caterham 21

To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Austin Maestro weights approximately 444 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.

Because 2000 Caterham 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 21 (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro. 1983 Austin Maestro has automatic transmission and 2000 Caterham 21 has manual transmission. 2000 Caterham 21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Austin Maestro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Maestro 2000 Caterham 21
Make Austin Caterham
Model Maestro 21
Year Released 1983 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1794 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 8600 RPM
Torque 123 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 7200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.2 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87.6 mm 89.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 11.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 984 kg 540 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1590 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2230 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]