1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2002 Citroen C2
To start off, 2002 Citroen C2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 67 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C2 weights approximately 121 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen C2 (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2002 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Maestro | C2 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 82 mm |
Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 166 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |