1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (109 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 859 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (178 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Maestro | Ram |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 5212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 408 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3530 mm |