1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2002 Nissan Avenir
To start off, 2002 Nissan Avenir is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Avenir is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Avenir weights approximately 565 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 2002 Nissan Avenir is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Avenir will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Avenir has automatic transmission and 1983 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1983 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Avenir will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 2002 Nissan Avenir | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Maestro | Avenir |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |
