1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1167 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Maestro | E-150 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 388 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 132 L |