1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 558 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (321 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Maestro 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model Maestro Mustang
Year Released 1983 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 4009 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 86 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 123 Nm 321 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.2 mm 100.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87.6 mm 84.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 984 kg 1542 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2620 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]