1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Maestro | Armada |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.6 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3140 mm |
