1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,497 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (83 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (67 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 1485 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Aveo (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2006 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Maestro | Aveo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 2360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |