1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2007 Cadillac STS

To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 798 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2007 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Maestro 2007 Cadillac STS
Make Austin Cadillac
Model Maestro STS
Year Released 1983 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 3563 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 86 HP 253 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 123 Nm 342 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.2 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87.6 mm 85.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.2:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 984 kg 1782 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2960 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]