1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (67 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1983 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1983 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Maestro 2007 Mazda CX-9
Make Austin Mazda
Model Maestro CX-9
Year Released 1983 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 67 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 100 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2880 mm