1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2009 Nissan Cube

To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1983 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1983 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Austin Maestro 2009 Nissan Cube
Make Austin Nissan
Model Maestro Cube
Year Released 1983 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 1797 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 66 HP 120 HP
Torque 102 Nm 127 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2830 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 82 L