1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2009 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Peugeot 4007 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Peugeot 4007 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 2009 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Peugeot 4007 (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Peugeot 4007 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro. 1983 Austin Maestro has automatic transmission and 2009 Peugeot 4007 has manual transmission. 2009 Peugeot 4007 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Austin Maestro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2009 Peugeot 4007 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | Maestro | 4007 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |