1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (109 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maestro | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2640 mm |