1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Austin Maestro (67 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Austin Maestro (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Austin Maestro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Austin Maestro | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Maestro | Clio |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
