1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1956 Volvo 120
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Volvo 120 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1956 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1956 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Volvo |
| Model | A 112 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2610 mm |
