1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 525 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1960 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1983 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |