1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1963 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Skoda 1202 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 439 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1963 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1963 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Skoda |
| Model | A 112 | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 30 L |
