1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 978 cc (3 cylinders), 1966 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 444 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Autobianchi | DKW |
| Model | A 112 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 31 L |
