1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1968 Reliant Regal
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 211 kg more than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Because 1968 Reliant Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Reliant Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1968 Reliant Regal | |
Make | Autobianchi | Reliant |
Model | A 112 | Regal |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 29 HP |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 120 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 1940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 27 L |