1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1968 Simca 1200S
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 1,204 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Simca 1200S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Simca 1200S weights approximately 189 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1968 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1968 Simca 1200S | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Simca |
| Model | A 112 | 1200S |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 53 L |
