1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 318 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Zastava |
Model | A 112 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2430 mm |