1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250 would be higher. At 2,525 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250 weights approximately 694 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1979 Mercedes-Benz 250 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 112 | 250 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2525 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |