1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,893 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 504 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Autobianchi | Fiat |
Model | A 112 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1893 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |