1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 747 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 112 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1413 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
