1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1998 Lotus Elise
To start off, 1998 Lotus Elise is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Lotus Elise weights approximately 39 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1998 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 1998 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Autobianchi | Lotus |
Model | A 112 | Elise |
Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 40 L |