1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2000 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Outback weights approximately 824 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 2000 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Subaru |
| Model | A 112 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |
