1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-250 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2009 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 115 L |
