1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 769 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Fiat |
| Model | A 112 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 191 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 58 L |
