1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Jeep |
| Model | A 112 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 85 L |
