1983 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Smart Fortwo weights approximately 174 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1983 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1983 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Autobianchi A 112 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Autobianchi | Smart |
Model | A 112 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 33 L |