1983 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne (328 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 970 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne (610 Nm @ 2450 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1983 Bentley Mulsanne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bentley Mulsanne | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Bentley | Triumph |
Model | Mulsanne | Renown |
Year Released | 1983 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2450 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2750 mm |