1983 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1996 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1996 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 491 kg more than 1996 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1983 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bentley Mulsanne | 1996 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | Mulsanne | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2256 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2750 mm |